On 2nd February, exactly 40 days after Christmas, the Church celebrates the liturgical feast of the Presentation of Jesus in the Temple. This year, as it falls on a Sunday, it takes precedence over the Sunday readings. This feast is popularly known as Candlemas, as on this day, candles are blessed, symbolising Christ, the light of the world. [...]

The Feast of the Encounter

"A light for revelation to the Gentiles."
Luke 2:22-40

On 2nd February, exactly 40 days after Christmas, the Church celebrates the liturgical feast of the Presentation of Jesus in the Temple. This year, as it falls on a Sunday, it takes precedence over the Sunday readings. This feast is popularly known as Candlemas, as on this day, candles are blessed, symbolising Christ, the light of the world.

This feast is very ancient: it originated in the East and spread to the West after the 6th century. In the past, it was dedicated to the Purification of the Virgin Mary, as recalled in today's Gospel. According to Jewish custom, a woman was considered impure due to menstrual blood for a period of 40 days after giving birth to a male child (and for 80 days in the case of a female!). Like any observant Jewish woman, Mary, after forty days, went to the Temple to purify herself and offer a sacrifice in obedience to the Torah (Leviticus 12:1-8): a lamb and a dove, or, if she was poor, two turtledoves or two young pigeons. This explains why Mary and Joseph went to the Temple with Jesus and offered two turtledoves or two pigeons (Luke 2:22-24)
With Pope Paul VI’s liturgical reform (1969), today’s celebration regained its original title of the Presentation of the Lord.

According to Sacred Scripture, every firstborn, whether human or animal, belonged to God (Exodus 13:2). The firstborn son was redeemed by a payment of five silver shekels within 30 days of birth (Numbers 18:15-16). This redemption was a sign of the consecration of firstborns to God, in remembrance of the liberation from Egypt when God struck down the Egyptian firstborns but spared those of the Israelites (Exodus 13:1-2,11-16).

However, we note that in Sacred Scripture, there is no specific law requiring the presentation of the firstborn son in the Temple. Saint Luke does not mention the payment of the redemption but speaks instead of his presentation in the Temple.

The readings help us to understand the profound theological meaning of this feast.
In the first reading, the prophet Malachi (3:1-4) announces the Lord’s messianic entry into His Temple to purify both the priesthood and the people from their infidelities. Thus, the presentation of the Child prophetically foreshadows His entrance into the Temple to purify both worship and the Temple itself. Indeed, His body becomes the new Temple.
In the second reading, the author of the Letter to the Hebrews (2:14-18) presents Jesus, who, having become like His brothers in every way, became the merciful high priest, who came to purify the people from their sins.

The Gospel passage is rich in references to Sacred Scripture. Saint Luke is a refined storyteller and, in his writings, he masterfully blends biblical texts with different Jewish traditions. His intention is not so much historical as catechetical and theological.

Behind this seemingly simple and linear account, there are subtle allusions to various texts: Malachi’s prophecy of God’s entrance into His Temple (Malachi 3); the episode of young Samuel being brought to the Temple at Shiloh by his mother Hannah (1 Samuel 1-2); the account of the Ark of the Covenant being brought to Jerusalem (1 Kings 8); Ezekiel’s vision of the return of the “Glory of the Lord” (Shekinah); and finally, allusions to the prophet Daniel’s vision concerning Jerusalem and the Temple (Daniel 9).

We could therefore say that “Jesus enters the Temple not to consecrate Himself but to consecrate it and take possession of it. The reference to Malachi, Samuel, and Daniel reveals Luke’s deeper intention, which is not merely to recount simple ‘facts’ but ‘events,’ ‘kairòi,’ that embrace and determine all of history: that of Israel and the new one that begins with the birth of Jesus” (Paolo Farinella).

Points for Reflection

1. The Feast of "Here I Am"
The Presentation of Jesus in the Temple can be reread in the light of Psalm 40:7-9, reinterpreted by the author of the Letter to the Hebrews in these terms: “When Christ came into the world, he said: […] ‘Here I am, I have come to do your will’” (Hebrews 10:5-10). This “Here I am” of Christ to the Father is, at the same time, a “Here I am” addressed to every person. The relationship of faith is a continuous loving dialogue between God’s “Here I am” and ours. However, the truth of our “Here I am” is concretely manifested in our response to the needs of others.
The drama of God and humanity is well expressed in these words: “I revealed myself to those who did not ask for me, I was found by those who did not seek me. I said, ‘Here I am, here I am,’ to a nation that did not call on my name” (Isaiah 65:1).

2. The Feast of the Encounter
This feast originated in the East under the name “Hypapante,” meaning “Encounter.” God comes to meet His people, and we go to meet Him. The procession, as a communal act, expresses this profound reality of the Christian faith: walking together towards the Lord. The physical movement recalls the spiritual movement of the soul.
This dimension of encounter is multi-faceted. Simeon and Anna represent believing Israel and the Old Testament welcoming the New. Moreover, this couple symbolises all humanity walking towards the light of Christ. Finally, the encounter between the elderly couple and the young couple, Joseph and Mary, expresses the communion between generations. Today’s feast is, therefore, a beautiful and eloquent icon of the Christian vocation and the ideal of a humanity journeying towards an encounter with God and with one another.

3. The Feast of Light
The theme of light is a fundamental and distinctive characteristic of this feast. Jesus is the Light that comes to illuminate every person, but the darkness did not receive it (John 1:4-9). For this reason, Jesus and every one of His disciples become a “sign of contradiction.” To live in the Light and be witnesses of the Light, we must accept being signs of contradiction, ready to face opposition from the “darkness” that will attempt to overcome the Light!

Fr. Manuel João Pereira Correia, mccj

All Were Waiting For Him
Only Anna and Simeon Recognized Him

Luke 2:22-40

Israel has jealously guarded and meditated Malachi’s prophecy that we found in the first reading. For centuries, she has called for its fulfillment and has cultivated the certainty that one day God would give a demonstration of his strength against those who did not keep his law.

In today’s Gospel, Luke tells of the Lord’s surprising answer to this expectation. His triumphant entrance into the sanctuary, among hosts of angels, stern judge ready to condemn, was expected. Here instead he enters the temple in the most unexpected way: a weak and helpless baby, wrapped in swaddling clothes, supported by the arms of a girl just on her teens, accompanied by the young husband.

It is difficult to recognize in that child, all equal to the others, “the fire and the lye” sent from Heaven to purify Israel. Only spiritually sensitive people could see in him the “light that enlightens all people.”

In the first part of the passage (vv. 22-24) the episode of Jesus’ Presentation in the Temple is narrated.

The Jewish law prescribed that all the firstborn, both of men and animals, were to be consecrated to the Lord (Ex 13:1-16). Since children could not be sacrificed, they were redeemed with the offering of a clean animal that was sacrificed in their place. Wealthy parents handed to the priests a lamb, the poor a pair of doves or turtledoves.

Mary and Joseph have fulfilled this requirement of the Torah. Luke takes the opportunity to point out that the Nazareth family belonged to the category of the poor. They were not able to offer a lamb.

God’s love for the last ones, the sinners, the impure persons is a theme dear to the evangelist. With a tinge of almost imperceptible language he, from the beginning of his Gospel, places the family of Jesus not only among the poor but also among the unclean.

According to the law of Israel (Lev 12) only the new mother had to submit herself to the purification rituals. Luke speaks instead of “their purification” (v. 22), as if, in solidarity with the sinful humanity, the entire holy family had gone to the temple in search of purification.

A second theme interests the Evangelist: the scrupulous observance, by the holy family, of the requirements of Lord’s law. It is confirmed with an almost pedantic insistence: “according to the law of Moses” (v. 22); “as it is written in the law of the Lord” (v. 23); “as ordered in the law of the Lord” (v. 24); “to do him according to the custom of the law” (v. 27); “required by the law of the Lord” (v. 39).

Luke wants to point out Jesus to his communities as the model of adherence to the will of the Father from the first moments of his life. This harmony with the designs of God is possible only to those who, like the members of the holy family, have chosen the word of Holy Scripture as a guide to their steps.

Mary and Joseph know that the child they carry in their arms is not theirs: he was entrusted by God to their care but remains God’s. They will guard him with care until the day in which he will inaugurate the extraordinary mission he is destined to. It is a mission not revealed to them and is completely shrouded in mystery.

They take him in the temple and consecrate him to the Lord: they recognize that he is the Lord’s. They will never withhold him for themselves; they will prepare him to deliver him as a gift to the world—in the time appointed by God.

They are a model for all the parents to whom God entrusts his children. These are not creatures on which one folds up with possessive love. They are Heaven’s gift to give to the world. Parents are called to consecrate them to the Lord: to discover the mission which the Heavenly Father has destined them and put them in a position to carry it out.

The second part of the passage (vv. 25-35) is the center of today’s Gospel. The scene takes place in the temple.

The vast esplanade that Herod the Great has just finished building is teeming with pilgrims. They are visiting the holy place to pray, to receive instructions from the rabbis seated on the porch of Solomon, to offer burnt offerings. They are religious and devout people. They seem, therefore, in the ideal spiritual condition to recognize and welcome the expected envoy of the Lord.

Yet when muddled up in the crowd, Joseph and Mary enter the holy place holding the son, no one realizes the extraordinary event that is taking place. No one can imagine that that baby is the light of the world.

Only Simeon, when he notices them, is caught by a sudden shudder, by an uncontrollable emotion. He makes his way among the people, heads towards them. Upon reaching the child, he takes him from the arms of his parents. He raised him up to heaven moved and exclaimed: “Now, O Lord, you can dismiss your servant in peace, for you have fulfilled your word and my eyes have seen your salvation” (vv. 29-30).

Simeon, the godly man who has spent many days of his life in the Lord’s temple pondering the scriptures, how was he able to recognize in the newborn the “light of the people”? What made him different from the other Israelites present in the temple? He was not an old man—as he is customary depicted. Luke describes him thus: “he was upright and devout, waiting for the time when the Lord would comfort Israel” (v. 25) and further on he was a man “led by the Spirit” (v. 27).

These are the interior dispositions that characterize the contemplatives, those who can discern the true reality, those who find themselves beyond the appearances of this world. It’s not enough to be pious and religious to see people and the world with God’s eyes.

Simeon is an exemplary man. Throughout his life he has chosen the Spirit of the Lord as confidant; he has kept alive the certainty that God is faithful to his promises and lived in the light of the Holy Scriptures. For this, he is peaceful and happy. His view extends beyond the narrow horizons of the present time; he contemplates his fate far and asks the Lord to welcome him into his peace.

There are people who, as they advance in years, become sad, sometimes also hard to deal with. Their dissatisfaction often depends on sickness, the decline of forces, but other times it comes from not having spent their lives for lofty ideals and by fear of death. In a last attempt to cling to this world, they even withdraw in themselves, complain if they are not the center of attention, if not all are ready to meet their demands.

Not so Simeon. He does not think of himself but of others, of all humanity, to the joy that people will experience when the kingdom of God will be established.

He does not regret the past. He realizes that evil existing in the world is enormous; he does not cultivate a pessimistic vision of the present and the future. He converses with God and looks forward. He knows that, in a short term, nothing will change. However, he is happy all the same because he was lucky enough to contemplate the dawn of salvation. He rejoices as the farmer who, at the end of the sowing day, already dreams of the heavy rains, and then the bountiful harvest.

He is the symbol of the faithful remnant of Israel who for many centuries has been waiting for the Messiah. He does not limit himself to welcoming Jesus in his arms but takes him to offer Jesus to the world, to present him to everyone as “the light.” He understood that the Messiah does not belong only to his people, but was sent to bring salvation to all nations, to be the light of all the nations (vv. 30-32).

Simeon makes a second prophecy, this time, directed to Mary: Jesus will become a sign of contradiction (vv. 34-35).

The image of the sword that will pierce the soul was sometimes interpreted as the announcement of Mary’s sorrow at the foot of the cross. That is not so. The mother of Jesus is understood here as a symbol of all the people. In the Bible, Israel is pictured as a mother-woman who will give the world the Savior.

Who, better than Mary, could portray this mother-Israel? It is to Israel that Simeon—sensing the drama that awaits him—turns. He announces the appearance of a deep, inevitable tear within her. In front of the Messiah sent from Heaven, some Israelite open the mind and heart to salvation, many others will close themselves in denial and so decreed their destruction.

In the third part (vv. 36-38) Luke introduces Anna, the elderly prophetess who recognized the Lord in the child considered by all a common newborn. Who gave her this spiritual sensitivity? From where does this piercing look come from?

Anna—the evangelist explains—was a woman intimately united to the Lord. All her life she thought only of him: “She had been continually about the temple serving God as a widow night and day in fasting and prayer” (v. 37).

She was eighty-four years old and this number—which is equivalent to 7×12—has a symbolic meaning: 7 indicates perfection, 12 the people of Israel. Anna is the holy people that come to full maturity, delivering the awaited Savior to the world.

She belonged to the tribe of Asher, the smallest and most insignificant of the tribes of Israel. Luke notes this decisively marginal detail because he is the evangelist of the poor, of the last ones. He wants that the Christians of his community be convinced that they are the best prepared to recognize Jesus as the savior.

Anna had remained faithful to her husband to the point of not remarrying. Her choice has a theological significance for the evangelist. Like Simeon, Anna represents the faithful Israel. In her life, the bride-Israel has had only one love. Then she lived in the mourning of widowhood until the day when, in Jesus, she recognized her husband, the Lord. Then she again rejoiced, like the bride who finds her only love.

Anna did not depart from the temple because it was the home of “her husband.” They do not need other gods; those who live in intimacy with the Lord do not look for lovers. Like Anna and like all lovers, they do not speak of the loved one.

The passage ends (vv. 39-40) with the return of the Holy Family to Nazareth and with the notation concerning the growth of Jesus. He was not different from the other children of his village in any way except for the fact that he increased in wisdom, age, and in divine and human favor.

Fernando Armellini
Italian missionary and biblical scholar
https://sundaycommentaries.wordpress.com