[4344]
Having been invited by Your Most Reverend Eminence to express my judgement on the proposal made by Fr Carcereri, Prefect of the Camillian House in Berber, for the division of my Vicariate into two parts, that is, into Eastern and We s t e r n with the Nile and the White Nile as a border, one to be entrusted to my Verona Institute and the other to the Camillian Order; I am ready conscientiously to give you satisfaction by presenting submissively my opinion based on the soundest reasons and with a deep knowledge of the situation.
[4345]
The proposal for a division of Central Africa was conceived 22 years ago and brought to the attention of the Most Eminent Cardinal Fransoni and His Eminence Cardinal Barnabò, then Secretary. It was drafted, studied and discussed from 1855 to 1865, when it was a matter of dividing the Vicariate between the German Missionaries of the Pro-Vicar Dr Knoblecher and the Mazza Institute in Verona, of which I was a member, and when in 1865 it was proposed to divide it between the aforesaid Mazza Institute and the Franciscan Order. In this affair I took a more active part and, in agreement with that most famous Historiographer of the Austrian Empire and Court, Counsellor de Hurter, President of the High Committee of the Society of Mary in Vienna and with the most enlightened Professor Mitterutzner of Bressanone (who is the most erudite and profound expert on the missions in Central Africa, for which he published two dictionaries in the two languages of the White Nile, Dinka and Bari), my predecessors the Pro-Vicars Apostolic, the most worthy of my missionary companions and I studied the matter with the utmost vigilance and care.
[4346]
We studied the possibility of dividing the Vicariate in all directions, East and We s t , with the Nile and the White Nile as a border, as proposed above by Carcereri, and North and South, with the Jebel Niemati on the 12th parallel as a border, as suggested by the above-mentioned Professor Mitterutzner, as may be seen in the Report I presented to the Most Eminent Cardinal Barnabò in 1865. We took into consideration all the journeys and explorations made in the eastern part of the Vicariate by the Egyptian expedition in 1824, by those of Linant Bey de Beaufond and of M. D’Arnaud in 1839–42, by Brun-Rollet, by M. De-Malzac in 1850–54 and by M. Penay, who got as far as Fadassi via Fazogl in 1852.
[4347]
We did not take into consideration the journeys of M. d’Abbadie, my friend who still lives in Paris and is quoted by Carcereri on the Rorbacher text, because d’Abbadie never visited the Blue Nile, nor did he ever go to Fazogl or to Fadassi, nor among the Barta or the Berta; but he diligently explored the little kingdoms of Abyssinia and the Galla tribes, missions entrusted to the Vincentians and the Capuchins, which d’Abbadie describes but which have nothing to do with my Vicariate. Instead our missionaries, for this purpose, undertook difficult explorations over the whole northern and western circumference and in several central tribes of the Eastern Vicariate.
[4348]
The Pro-Vicar Knoblecher went as many as eight times to the west of the Eastern Vi c a r i a t e as far as the 3rd degree of Latitude North; and Mgr Kirchner, Beltrame, Melotto, Überbacher, Mozgan, Kohl, Danninger, Lanz, Kauffmann, Morlang, other missionary companions and myself visited it before 1860. In 1855, Fr Beltrame, my companion from the Verona Institute, on a five month trip scrupulously examined the whole length of the Blue Nile, Fazogl, Barta, Berta and Changalla as far as the borders with Abyssinia. In 1859, with Melotto and Beltrame, I visited not only the river Sobat, which flows into the White Nile at the 9th parallel Latitude North, being the first missionaries to penetrate as far as one can go on a small boat, but also as far as the interior of Dinka territory reaching the Agnarkwei. (1)
[4349]
And after most thorough studies of the territory, the tribes and the languages of the Eastern Vicariate, it was decided that it was of prime necessity to have Khartoum as a point of support for the governance of both the Eastern Vi c a r i a t e and the Western Vicariate and that, therefore, a division of the Vicariate was neither useful nor appropriate. It was thus deemed necessary that a single supreme chief should direct all the Missions in Central Africa, and that this should be done according to a single wisely conceived plan or system, remaining firm and unassailable in his relations with the Egyptian Government which, although it has possessions within the Vicariate extending over an area five times as large as the whole of France and is planning new conquests, after a thousand attempts at dividing and subdividing its administration, continues to maintain a single Hoccomdar, or Military Governor General, who supervises all the provinces from a single support base which is the city of Khartoum, where the supreme chief of the Missions of Central Africa should also have his normal residence, until the Sudan railway has been built and the communications made easier than they are today.
[4350]
Another falsehood is the assertion of the Camillians that in the Eastern Vi c a r i a t e there is not a single establishment of secular missionaries and at all the existing Stations are in the We s t e r n part. In fact, in the Eastern part there is
the Shellal house and the Berber house, which I founded and entrusted to the Camillians for five years with the obligation to care for the Catholics in the Provinces of Taka and Suakin which are in the eastern part of the Vicariate, and which they have not visited in two years. The main Mission of Khartoum is itself in the eastern part, as was the old mission of Gondokoro.
[4351]
As far as I am concerned, I also took the most diligent care of the eastern part; whereas the Camillians did not take care to cultivate it as was their duty.
Now the reasons which prompted the rejection of a division in the past are the same today. They are the very reasons which proved that the studies of many years and of many people for the purpose of an appropriate division were in vain. Therefore, an appropriate division of the Vicariate of Central Africa, even from an absolute point of view, is not possible today.
[4352]
Viewed in relation to the individuals who would be separately occupying and governing the two parts, the division would be not only useless, but even harmful as things stand. In fact, it would be more useful a) if the Camillians, who are demanding a part of the Vicariate, were to get it, and had more means at their disposal for it than the Verona Institutes would have. This does not appear to be the case, because as well as asking for half the Vicariate, they are also asking for half the resources, that is, half the money which I was able to raise with such difficulty from private benefactors and the aid associations. And together with half the Vicariate and half the resources, they would also expect me to give them the establishments, painstakingly founded by me, which exist in the part that would be assigned to them.
[4353]
Therefore, with regard to the available means, a division of the Vicariate would not be more useful. However, if there were parity of resources, it would be more useful, b) if the Camillians could dispose of a larger number of suitable candidates than my Verona Institutes. If it was up to me to judge this from all the Camillians who have worked and are working with me on the Mission and from the main aim of their institution, I would immediately say that, if not impossible, it is very difficult for the Camillian Order to provide more suitable candidates that those coming from my Institutes in Verona. So if there were parity of resources and of appropriate candidates, or the possession of greater and better means by the Camillians, the division of the Vicariate would be more useful, c) only if they were able to use a better Mission system than the one my secular Missionaries have or can have; but I do not believe that there can be a better system than the present one, which the past has taught us. In this respect, I shall return to the subject when I discuss the competence of the personnel provided by my Verona Institutes.
[4354]
Therefore, a division of the Vicariate between my Verona Institutes and the Camillians would not be more useful. Indeed, I dare say it would be harmful or at least dangerous; and this can very easily be deduced from the way they have behaved towards me. They have made every possible effort, using lies, slander and every illicit means (even if in vain) to discredit me and diminish and destroy my influence as well as that of the members of my Institute, not only with Muslims, heretics, Catholics, friends and enemies in the Vicariate, but even in Europe, in Verona, with the Associations of benefactors and many other people. Therefore the closeness of the Camillians would be harmful or at least dangerous.
[4355]
Therefore, so as not to harm or endanger my Institution, which I founded with so much toil and effort and which thank God has now a solid foundation to perpetuate the stability of the Mission in Central Africa, in conscience I cannot give and I will not give my approval to the division of the Vicariate between my Institute and the Camillians or to surrendering the establishments and the resources, even in part. How could I possibly believe that these Camillians, who were not able to carry out the Convention I established with them in 1874 and development of a small part of the Vicariate no larger than Italy, could ever conscientiously assume and govern half the Vicariate, without good candidates and without a house of their own for acclimatisation in Cairo, which is absolutely essential for the steady support of a Mission in Central Africa?
[4356]
I cannot and I do not give my approval for the division of the Vicariate, nor for the cession, even in part, of the establishments founded by me with the Lord’s help and the resources which St Joseph granted to me and my Verona Institutes for the development of the Missions entrusted to them.
[4357]
I do not know how the Camillians could have led anyone to believe that I am prepared to leave them half the Vicariate and that I could have promised them such a thing when, in 1874, before the Convention, it was established that they would always be in support and assistance of my Missionaries, as can be seen both in the Convention and in many letters from Fr Carcereri himself. This, for example, is what he wrote to me from Rome in April 1874: “… here are the main points which have been agreed: that Fr Guardi will give us other Missionary priests from the Order… that these religious will be able to be parish priests, confessors for women religious and also heads of Mission Stations, and be of service to the Vicariate at your request or that of your successors… in adiutum, so to speak… But Fr Guardi asks that we have our own house and not our own mission, so that the religious may gather there from time to time to renew their spirit and live there, should they not have duties elsewhere, to live by the rule… We will only be of help wherever we are needed, as Fr General Guardi has said several times…”
Appendix I
[4358]
That, and no more, is what Fr Carcereri was asking in April 1874, declaring that he and his companions would never have aspired to having an independent mission, but that he and they would always be of help to my secular Missionaries “who have first rights to the Mission, since it was granted to them”.
[4359]
Those are precisely the sentiments that Fr Carcereri himself revealed to Fr Bartolo Rolleri of Cairo in a letter of his from Rome dated 18th April 1874, adding that this was what was agreed even in Propaganda: “… For us Camillians, everything has been agreed in this way both in Propaganda and with our General: from the Pro-Vicar will be requested a house with a church, travel, board and clothing expenses; each priest is at the disposal of the Pro-Vicar and to assist the Missionaries, with permission to be parish priest, master, Vicar General and the like. I have already written this to the Pro-Vicar, but you would do well to remind him again”.
Appendix J
[4360]
And it is on these conditions that I accepted them and installed them in Berber as can be seen from the Convention. Therefore, if Fr Carcereri’s behaviour especially since 1874, had not with good reason aroused serious suspicions in me as regards his aspirations, I would now be expressing the greatest wonder about the proposal which he recently made to Propaganda for the division of the Vicariate of Central Africa into two parts, one of which would absolutely have to be entrusted to his Order. However, knowing his secret intentions, it does not surprise me at all that he is revealing them and asking for them to be put into practice. It is quite true that Fr Carcereri, convinced that without a good enough reason the Sacred Congregation of Propaganda would not divest my Verona Institutes of an iota of their rights, he will have put forward such reasons in advance and even together with his request. But according to me, there can only be three valid reasons for the division of the Vicariate, namely: 1) that I and others from the Verona Institutes are inept in properly governing the Vicariate; 2) that the number of candidates from the Verona Institutes is insufficient; 3) that I have committed a violation of the contract or that I have unjustly mistreated them.
[4361]
To establish whether the first of the above-mentioned reasons for the implementation of the requested division exists, which, without taking into consideration the toils I have put up with for over twenty years, the perils I have overcome, the resources I provided, the mortifications I have suffered, calls attention only to examining the documents I have issued throughout my general governance, I still think, without saying that I am the most suited, that it does not exist. a) I did nothing at all in haste, as may be thought and may appear if one considers words rather than facts. Instead I did everything after serious study, without disregard for the advice of others; whereas the inflexibility of Fr Carcereri, even in a subordinate position, should not be passed over in silence: he has ideas and wants to succeed at all costs, even though his ideas are rarely righteous, good and just. b) I dealt with the civil authorities in such a way that without being verbally rigid, I always in fact obtained respect for the rights of the Mission and their good favour, even though I sometimes had to renew friendship between the Mission and the civil authorities embittered by Fr Carcereri’s character which disturbs and offends and tries immediately to knock down whatever crosses his path.
[4362]
All this can, albeit in a minor way, be seen in the Reports I have presented. Let the Sacred Congregation believe that it is against my will that I lower myself in making such declarations and such comparisons. I would never have believed that, after vowing to work only for the glory of God, I could be forced to abase myself in such confessions. However, having been provoked, the good of Africa and therefore the glory of God, as well as justice itself, force me to do so, and even prompt me to observe: c) that nothing inappropriate is contained in the prescribed disciplinary dispositions laid out in the Report I presented in June; and d) that during the two years 1874–1875 in which I managed the administration, the handling of the financial means was, in the circumstances, nothing less than appropriate, whereas, in this respect too, I could make many and serious remarks about Fr Carcereri, as can partly be seen in the above-mentioned report which I presented.
[4363]
And here, for love of brevity, I believe I can conclude by saying that, if I am not the most suited person to govern the Mission, I have nonetheless never acted without a sound reason, nor do I remember doing something for which I now have reason to reproach myself, except the excessive leniency I showed to Fathers Carcereri and Franceschini despite their demerits; demerits I did not know well enough to begin with, but only suspected; demerits which, without hesitation, make me say that any of my present Missionaries would be more able, appropriate and upright to govern than either of these two.
[4364]
As to the 2nd reason concerning the presumed insufficient number of candidates coming from the Verona Institute, I say that this does not subsist either. The numbers would only be insufficient for a Mission system which, going against the facts, considered useful and feasible in Central Africa the multiplication of a host of little stations in as many scarcely populated cities, towns and villages as there are here and there. The Mission system I have practised so far was first proposed to the Sacred Congregation of Propaganda and was approved by it. I hastened to implement it and, by the grace of God, the results followed beyond my expectations, despite a thousand difficulties.
[4365]
Building comfortable stations, supplying them with enough priests, lay craftsmen and Sisters and doing this in main towns where the population is more numerous and where people occasionally come from the hamlets scattered here and there is, according to me, not only the most economical system, as is immediately obvious, but especially in Central Africa, it is the most appropriate, since being more united in this way, it is easier to deal with the illnesses and physical and moral perils to which the Missionaries are otherwise exposed.
[4366]
Of all the possible systems, this seems to me to be the most useful one because by having the stations in the main towns, being fewer, they can be built with that unique decorum which helps us to gain and preserve moral influence among these people, because in this way it is easier to see to their stability and because, since it is thus easier to deploy more Sisters for the complete education of the women, more craftsmen to teach the necessary skills for the conservation of the faith and more priests in each station, this method is the one most easily, perfectly and securely equipped to ensure the material and moral well-being of both sexes. This is the system which, having been approved by the Sacred Congregation of Propaganda, I have used so far, and to proceed with this system, the Verona Institutes offer and will continue to offer enough personnel.
[4367]
They offer, and will be offering, enough personnel to cover and manage not only the part that would be granted to them if the Vicariate were divided, but also to cover and manage the part which, by dividing the Vicariate, would be given to the Camillians. This is why, in addition to my not being able or willing to consent to a division of the Vicariate, I do not feel like relinquishing the eastern part, since it can properly and usefully be managed by my Verona Institutes, and the establishments built there are the fruit of so much effort on my part. Neither do I feel like relinquishing the western part because it can be properly and usefully managed by my Verona Institutes, together with the eastern part, because that is the true Mission territory, the territory offering the greatest hopes.
[4368]
After all this, I believe the Sacred Congregation will not want to decide to divide the Vicariate because of the third reason, which rather than supporting the requested partition in favour of the Camillian Fathers would be more conducive to their being removed altogether from the Mission. It was not I who treated them badly, but they me, in trying to oust me from the Mission. For if they were in any way offended by me, it was on account of their behaviour, and my actions were all just, neither as many nor as grave as they should have been, nor yet as many or as grave as they say or believe them to have been.
[4369]
All this appears clearly in the Reports which, under their provocation, I had to present to the Sacred Congregation and in which I explained only what I could prove about them with their own documents. But in conscience I could have said much more not only about Carcereri and Franceschini, but also about other Camillian religious who, though not mentioned in my recent reports, also caused me serious problems.
[4370]
I was therefore unjustly offended by those Camillians whom I am aware of having always treated generously, admitting them as brothers to share with me in the joys and sorrows of the sublime Apostolate of Central Africa, lavishing on them the most diligent cares and advantages, entrusting them with the most honourable assignments in preference to the Missionaries of my own Institutes, who would have been more worthy of them. Therefore it seems to me impossible, in view of so many demerits on the part of the Camillians, that the Sacred Congregation should wish to grant the undeserved prize of a special Mission, depriving my own Institute of it: for in such a case it would appear to be rewarding the guilty and punishing the innocent.
[4371]
But since the Camillians themselves, by saying that they would only stay on the Mission if they were granted a portion of the Vicariate, have all taken the road for a return to Europe, it is my hope that the Sacred Congregation will accept their resolution and call them all back from the Mission.
I have the honour of kissing your Sacred Purple and remaining in all respect,
Your Most Reverend Eminence’s most devoted, obedient and respectful son
Daniel Comboni
Pro-Vicar Apostolic of Central Africa
[4372]
(1) Since 21st August last, my representative, Canon Fiore, sent my Missionary Fr Gennaro Martini and two others to Khartoum charged with visiting the Blue Nile, the Barta, the Fazogl, the Kadaref, the Galabat and the province of Taka where there are Catholics totally neglected by the Camillians.